On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> wrote:
> On Saturday, December 12, 2015 08:29:37 AM Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> On Dec 11, 2015 1:24 PM, "Kenneth Graunke" <kenn...@whitecape.org> wrote:
> [snip]
>> > @@ -302,12 +302,12 @@ LOAD(shared, 1, 1, NIR_INTRINSIC_CAN_ELIMINATE)
>> > #define STORE(name, srcs, indices, flags) \
>> > INTRINSIC(store_##name, srcs, ARR(0, 1, 1, 1), false, 0, 0, indices,
>> flags)
>> >
>> > -/* src[] = { value, offset }. const_index[] = { base } */
>> > -STORE(output, 2, 1, 0)
>> > -/* src[] = { value, vertex, offset }. const_index[] = { base } */
>> > -STORE(per_vertex_output, 3, 1, 0)
>> > +/* src[] = { value, offset }. const_index[] = { base, write_mask } */
>> > +STORE(output, 2, 2, 0)
>> > +/* src[] = { value, vertex, offset }. const_index[] = { base, write_mask
>> } */
>> > +STORE(per_vertex_output, 3, 2, 0)
>> > /* src[] = { value, block_index, offset }. const_index[] = { write_mask
>> } */
>> > -STORE(ssbo, 3, 1, 0)
>> > +STORE(ssbo, 3, 2, 0)
>>
>> I don't think you meant to change SSBOs.
>
> Oops. Yeah, that was a mistake when resolving merge conflicts.
> Changed for v3.
>
>> > /* src[] = { value, offset }. const_index[] = { base, write_mask } */
>> > STORE(shared, 2, 1, 0)
>
> While we're here, this comment seems wrong, doesn't it? There's only
> one index, but the comment lists two. (It's wrong before my patch...)
Yes, we should fix that. It's only one index. That was my mistake
while rebasing on shared variables.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
