On Dec 15, 2015 12:30 AM, "Abdiel Janulgue" <abdiel.janul...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > On 12/10/2015 06:23 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > While we're at it, we also add support for the possibility that the > > indirect is, in fact, a constant. This shouldn't happen in the common case > > (if it does, that means NIR failed to constant-fold something), but it's > > possible so we should handle it. > > Perhaps this should re-ordered before patch 3?
We could, but it really doesn't matter. No MOV_INDIRECT ever hits the generator pre-BDW prior to patch 15. They get lowered away to pull constant loads. --Jason > > --- > > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp | 4 ++ > > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_generator.cpp | 51 +++++++++++++++++++------- > > 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp > > index 9eaf8d0..a2ec03e 100644 > > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp > > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp > > @@ -4424,6 +4424,10 @@ get_lowered_simd_width(const struct brw_device_info *devinfo, > > case SHADER_OPCODE_TYPED_SURFACE_WRITE_LOGICAL: > > return 8; > > > > + case SHADER_OPCODE_MOV_INDIRECT: > > + /* Prior to Broadwell, we only have 8 address subregisters */ > > + return devinfo->gen < 8 ? 8 : inst->exec_size; > > + > > default: > > return inst->exec_size; > > } > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_generator.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_generator.cpp > > index d86eee1..7fa6d84 100644 > > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_generator.cpp > > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_generator.cpp > > @@ -351,22 +351,47 @@ fs_generator::generate_mov_indirect(fs_inst *inst, > > > > unsigned imm_byte_offset = reg.nr * REG_SIZE + reg.subnr; > > > > - /* We use VxH indirect addressing, clobbering a0.0 through a0.7. */ > > - struct brw_reg addr = vec8(brw_address_reg(0)); > > + if (indirect_byte_offset.file == BRW_IMMEDIATE_VALUE) { > > + imm_byte_offset += indirect_byte_offset.ud; > > > > - /* The destination stride of an instruction (in bytes) must be greater > > - * than or equal to the size of the rest of the instruction. Since the > > - * address register is of type UW, we can't use a D-type instruction. > > - * In order to get around this, re re-type to UW and use a stride. > > - */ > > - indirect_byte_offset = > > - retype(spread(indirect_byte_offset, 2), BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_UW); > > + reg.nr = imm_byte_offset / REG_SIZE; > > + reg.subnr = imm_byte_offset % REG_SIZE; > > + brw_MOV(p, dst, reg); > > + } else { > > + /* Prior to Broadwell, there are only 8 address registers. */ > > + assert(inst->exec_size == 8 || devinfo->gen >= 8); > > > > - /* Prior to Broadwell, there are only 8 address registers. */ > > - assert(inst->exec_size == 8 || devinfo->gen >= 8); > > + /* We use VxH indirect addressing, clobbering a0.0 through a0.7. */ > > + struct brw_reg addr = vec8(brw_address_reg(0)); > > > > - brw_MOV(p, addr, indirect_byte_offset); > > - brw_MOV(p, dst, retype(brw_VxH_indirect(0, imm_byte_offset), dst.type)); > > + /* The destination stride of an instruction (in bytes) must be greater > > + * than or equal to the size of the rest of the instruction. Since the > > + * address register is of type UW, we can't use a D-type instruction. > > + * In order to get around this, re re-type to UW and use a stride. > > + */ > > + indirect_byte_offset = > > + retype(spread(indirect_byte_offset, 2), BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_UW); > > + > > + if (devinfo->gen < 8) { > > + /* Prior to broadwell, we have a restriction that the bottom 5 bits > > + * of the base offset and the bottom 5 bits of the indirect must add > > + * to less than 32. In other words, the hardware needs to be able to > > + * add the bottom five bits of the two to get the subnumber and add > > + * the next 7 bits of each to get the actual register number. Since > > + * the indirect may cause us to cross a register boundary, this makes > > + * it almost useless. We could try and do something clever where we > > + * use a actual base offset if base_offset % 32 == 0 but that would > > + * mean we were generating different code depending on the base > > + * offset. Instead, for the sake of consistency, we'll just do the > > + * add ourselves. > > + */ > > + brw_ADD(p, addr, indirect_byte_offset, brw_imm_uw(imm_byte_offset)); > > + brw_MOV(p, dst, retype(brw_VxH_indirect(0, 0), dst.type)); > > + } else { > > + brw_MOV(p, addr, indirect_byte_offset); > > + brw_MOV(p, dst, retype(brw_VxH_indirect(0, imm_byte_offset), dst.type)); > > + } > > + } > > } > > > > void > >
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev