On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 11:39 -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 10:02:16 AM Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> > The BDW PRM Vol2a: Command Reference: Instructions, section 
> > MEDIA_CURBE_LOAD,
> > says that 'CURBE Total Data Length' and 'CURBE Data Start Address' are
> > 64-byte aligned. This is different from previous gens, that were 32-byte
> > aligned.
> > 
> > v2 (Jordan):
> >   - CURBE Data Start Address is also 64-byte aligned.
> >   - The call to brw_state_batch should also use 64-byte alignment.
> >   - Improve PRM reference.
> > 
> > Fixes the following SSBO CTS tests on BDW:
> > ES31-CTS.shader_storage_buffer_object.basic-atomic-case1-cs
> > ES31-CTS.shader_storage_buffer_object.basic-operations-case1-cs
> > ES31-CTS.shader_storage_buffer_object.basic-operations-case2-cs
> > ES31-CTS.shader_storage_buffer_object.basic-stdLayout_UBO_SSBO-case2-cs
> > ES31-CTS.shader_storage_buffer_object.advanced-write-fragment-cs
> > ES31-CTS.shader_storage_buffer_object.advanced-indirectAddressing-case2-cs
> > ES31-CTS.shader_storage_buffer_object.advanced-matrix-cs
> > 
> > And many other CS CTS tests as reported by Marta Lofstedt.
> > ---
> >  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_cs_state.c | 12 ++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_cs_state.c 
> > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_cs_state.c
> > index 1fde69c..df0f301 100644
> > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_cs_state.c
> > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_cs_state.c
> > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ brw_upload_cs_state(struct brw_context *brw)
> >  
> >     uint32_t *bind = (uint32_t*) brw_state_batch(brw, 
> > AUB_TRACE_BINDING_TABLE,
> >                                              
> > prog_data->binding_table.size_bytes,
> > -                                            32, 
> > &stage_state->bind_bo_offset);
> > +                                            64, 
> > &stage_state->bind_bo_offset);
> 
> I don't understand this hunk - binding tables don't have anything to do
> with push constants.  These are for pull constants and UBOs.  At least
> in the 3D pipeline, we only align these to 32B, not 64.
> 
> >     unsigned local_id_dwords = 0;
> >  
> > @@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ brw_upload_cs_state(struct brw_context *brw)
> >  
> >     unsigned push_constant_data_size =
> >        (prog_data->nr_params + local_id_dwords) * sizeof(gl_constant_value);
> > -   unsigned reg_aligned_constant_size = ALIGN(push_constant_data_size, 32);
> > +   unsigned reg_aligned_constant_size =
> > +      ALIGN(push_constant_data_size, brw->gen < 8 ? 32 : 64);
> >     unsigned push_constant_regs = reg_aligned_constant_size / 32;
> >     unsigned threads = get_cs_thread_count(cs_prog_data);
> >  
> > @@ -138,11 +139,13 @@ brw_upload_cs_state(struct brw_context *brw)
> >     ADVANCE_BATCH();
> >  
> >     if (reg_aligned_constant_size > 0) {
> > +      const unsigned aligned_push_const_offset =
> > +         ALIGN(stage_state->push_const_offset, brw->gen < 8 ? 32 : 64);
> 
> This is wrong.  What you want is to change:
> 
>       param = (gl_constant_value*)
>          brw_state_batch(brw, type,
>                          reg_aligned_constant_size * threads,
>                          32, &stage_state->push_const_offset);
> 
> to use an alignment of 64 instead of 32 on Gen8+.  That way, it'll
> actually upload the data to a portion of the buffer that starts on
> a 64B aligned boundary.
> 
> As is, you're uploading the data to a 32B aligned section and then
> just fudging the pointer to be 64B aligned, possibly skipping over
> the first 32B.  Probably not what you wanted :)
> 
> Maybe you accidentally changed the wrong brw_state_batch call?

Ouch! yeah, I meant to change the other call, sorry about that. Anyway,
I think the patch proposed by Jordan is good so I won't send another
version.

Thanks for the review Ken!

Iago

> >        BEGIN_BATCH(4);
> >        OUT_BATCH(MEDIA_CURBE_LOAD << 16 | (4 - 2));
> >        OUT_BATCH(0);
> >        OUT_BATCH(reg_aligned_constant_size * threads);
> > -      OUT_BATCH(stage_state->push_const_offset);
> > +      OUT_BATCH(aligned_push_const_offset);
> >        ADVANCE_BATCH();
> >     }
> >  
> > @@ -241,7 +244,8 @@ brw_upload_cs_push_constants(struct brw_context *brw,
> >  
> >        const unsigned push_constant_data_size =
> >           (local_id_dwords + prog_data->nr_params) * 
> > sizeof(gl_constant_value);
> > -      const unsigned reg_aligned_constant_size = 
> > ALIGN(push_constant_data_size, 32);
> > +      const unsigned reg_aligned_constant_size =
> > +         ALIGN(push_constant_data_size, brw->gen < 8 ? 32 : 64);
> >        const unsigned param_aligned_count =
> >           reg_aligned_constant_size / sizeof(*param);
> >  
> > 


_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to