I'm not strictly opposed to passing this in, but... why not just fix it by removing that imho weird macro and instead use ULL suffix on literals?
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Oded Gabbay <oded.gab...@gmail.com> wrote: > The ISO C99 standard (7.18.4) specifies that C++ > implementations should define UINT64_C only when > __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS is defined. > > ecause we now use UINT64_C in our cpp files (since commit > 208bfc493debe0344d0b9cb93975981f14412628), we need to add this define. > > This also solves compilation errors with GCC 4.8.x on ppc64le machines. > > Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gab...@gmail.com> > --- > configure.ac | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index 9c3d1a3..8d19dab 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ _SAVE_LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS" > _SAVE_CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS" > > dnl Compiler macros > -DEFINES="-D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS" > +DEFINES="-D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS" > AC_SUBST([DEFINES]) > case "$host_os" in > linux*|*-gnu*|gnu*) > -- > 2.5.0 > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
