On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 12:31:11PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 06:51:22PM +0200, Topi Pohjolainen wrote: > > The logic in intel_miptree_create() uses the local copies > > for 64-byte aligned equivalent but only for stencil buffers which > > in turn are never x-tiled. This makes the logic a little more > > explicit and helps to keep subsequent patches easier to read. > > > > Signed-off-by: Topi Pohjolainen <topi.pohjolai...@intel.com> > > --- > > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c > > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c > > index 0edd59f..033f4c6 100644 > > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c > > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c > > @@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ intel_miptree_create(struct brw_context *brw, > > mt->tiling = I915_TILING_X; > > drm_intel_bo_unreference(mt->bo); > > mt->bo = drm_intel_bo_alloc_tiled(brw->bufmgr, "miptree", > > - total_width, total_height, mt->cpp, > > + mt->total_width, mt->total_height, > > mt->cpp, > > &mt->tiling, &pitch, alloc_flags); > > mt->pitch = pitch; > > } > > Maybe you can just move the stencil alignment down into the if statement and > make it even better isolated. Right now I think it's a little confusing to > have > the local variables defined and unused except gen < 6 + stencil. Either way: > Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widaw...@intel.com>
Really good call, thanks. Changed also the title to: i965: Isolate aligned dimensions for stencil only > > > BTW, maybe you can see if this still makes sense: > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/56792/ _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev