On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen
> <b...@basnieuwenhuizen.nl> wrote:
>> diff --git a/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_screen.h
>> b/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_screen.h
>> index 4f30e75..6d44cf7 100644
>> --- a/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_screen.h
>> +++ b/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_screen.h
>> @@ -109,13 +109,16 @@ struct pipe_screen {
>>
>> /**
>> * Query a compute-specific capability/parameter/limit.
>> - * \param param one of PIPE_COMPUTE_CAP_x
>> - * \param ret pointer to a preallocated buffer that will be
>> - * initialized to the parameter value, or NULL.
>> - * \return size in bytes of the parameter value that would be
>> - * returned.
>> + * \param ir_type shader IR type for which the param applies, or don't
>> care
>> + * if the param is not shader related
>> + * \param param one of PIPE_COMPUTE_CAP_x
>> + * \param ret pointer to a preallocated buffer that will be
>> + * initialized to the parameter value, or NULL.
>> + * \return size in bytes of the parameter value that would be
>> + * returned.
>> */
>> int (*get_compute_param)(struct pipe_screen *,
>> + unsigned ir_type,
>
> Should this be a enum pipe_shader_ir instead?
Same for the first patch I guess.
Marek
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
