Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> writes:

> All,
>
> We are getting very close to being able to merge the Vulkan driver into
> mesa master.  I've got around 30 patches on the mailing list that are still
> awaiting review.  Once those get merged, the diff between the "vulkan" and
> "master" branches is basically zero except for adding new files.  The going
> plan is to get the diff between the two branches down to zero except for
> the new "src/intel" directory and minimal build system changes and then do
> an actual git merge.  I know we don't usually do merges in this project,
> but the Vulkan driver is big and has a lot of history that we would like to
> preserve.  If you're strongly opposed to doing a merge, please speak up now!
>
> Things that still need review:
>
>  1) i965 back-end patches for indirect push constants
>  2) i965 and NIR patches to add a couple new opcodes
>  3) Misc i965 and NIR patches we've been carrying around in the vulkan
> branch for a while
>  4) A patch to configure.ac to add new flags for building Vulkan drivers
> (mostly written, not yet sent).
>
> Those will all undergo the normal review process and get pushed *before* we
> merge.  That way the only thing the merge does is add a new directory and a
> three or four lines each to configure.ac and src/Makefile.am.
>
> If people step up with code review, I'm hoping that we can merge some time
> this week or next.

I think a merge makes a ton of sense for this.  Having duplicate commits
in the history sucks, but maintaining history is worth it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to