On 26/07/16 22:16, Francisco Jerez wrote: > >>> -- However that spec change would have the side effect of making >>> the CTS test you're trying to fix non-compliant... >> This would not be the first case of a CTS test that is not correct due >> the complexities/ambiguities of the OpenGL spec. Or worse, CTS tests >> that are just >> > Heh, seems like some words were censored from your last paragraph. :P
Totally unintentional and innocent, I promise ;) When writing the email I didn't find a suitable word when writing that paragraph, and then I forgot to got back. Let's go simple and just say "wrong". >> So what about this: I open a Khronos bug (public unless someone thinks >> that it would be better private), using your explanation as a base to >> the description (although tempted to just point this email), and we put >> the patch/bugfix on hold until we get an answer? >> > Sure, feel free to use my last post as starting point, and thanks for > filing the bug at Khronos. :) Thanks to you for the patience and the long and detailed explanation. You can find the bug here: https://www.khronos.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1654 Is basically a edited form of your explanation (some sections are your explanation word by word). BR
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
