From: Marek Olšák <marek.ol...@amd.com>

I think this was an oversight when the PIPE_DUMP flags were added.
---
 src/gallium/drivers/ddebug/dd_draw.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/ddebug/dd_draw.c 
b/src/gallium/drivers/ddebug/dd_draw.c
index 97325e4..4ea3129 100644
--- a/src/gallium/drivers/ddebug/dd_draw.c
+++ b/src/gallium/drivers/ddebug/dd_draw.c
@@ -1084,21 +1084,24 @@ dd_after_draw(struct dd_context *dctx, struct dd_call 
*call)
          dd_pipelined_process_draw(dctx, call);
          break;
       case DD_DUMP_ALL_CALLS:
          if (!dscreen->no_flush)
             pipe->flush(pipe, NULL, 0);
          dd_write_report(dctx, call, 0, false);
          break;
       case DD_DUMP_APITRACE_CALL:
          if (dscreen->apitrace_dump_call ==
              dctx->draw_state.apitrace_call_number) {
-            dd_write_report(dctx, call, 0, false);
+            dd_write_report(dctx, call,
+                            PIPE_DUMP_CURRENT_STATES |
+                            PIPE_DUMP_CURRENT_SHADERS,
+                            false);
             /* No need to continue. */
             exit(0);
          }
          break;
       default:
          assert(0);
       }
    }
 
    ++dctx->num_draw_calls;
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to