On 27 July 2016 at 15:30, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 July 2016 at 01:02, Mauro Rossi <issor.or...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm sending the v2 re-spin of patch as per i965, rechecked twice >> line-by-line with Tomasz's one. >> >> Building ok, marshmallow-x86 booting ok and here are the results of Android >> CTS egl and gles2 x86 target tests >> >> Android CTS 6.0_r7 build:2906653 >> 07-16 00:52:42 I/DeviceManager: Detected new device 192.168.1.7:5555 >> cts-tf > list r >> Session Pass Fail Not Executed Start time Plan name >> Device serial(s) >> 0(EGL) 1410 24 0 2016.07.16_00.21.30 NA >> unknown >> 1(GLES2) 13832 82 0 2016.07.16_00.24.23 NA >> unknown >> cts-tf > >> >> I get the same results as per i965GM >> > Thanks Mauro. > > Can we get an ack/nack/r-b from any of the Intel devs ? How do you > feel on getting this in -stable ? > FTR the series is identical to the i965 patches by Chad/me/Tomasz > barring a few s/i915/i965/ style changes. > I've dropped the stable tag, added the above test results and fixed a few missing 'intel_sync' -> 'intel_gl_sync'.
Thanks Mauro ! Can you please check through the list [1] and let me know if anything else is outstanding ? Emil [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/project/mesa/patches/?submitter=15603&state=&q=&archive=&delegate= _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev