Hey Marek, On 18 November 2016 at 19:09, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Kai Wasserbäch > <k...@dev.carbon-project.org> wrote: >> wouldn't a tool like Phabricator be much better for reviewing and reliably >> tracking whether a patch has landed or not? Especially if you use it in >> combination with Arcanist? While I'm certainly not a core developer, I find >> patchwork clunky. Sometimes it doesn't pick up R-bs or doesn't recognise >> series, >> which makes seeing the actual state of a patch a bit tricky from time to >> time. >> >> In addition you would get things like automatically closure of bugs, nice >> referencing features and lots of other nice features. And AFAIK >> freedesktop.org >> already has a Phabricator instance, which could be used. > > OK, off topic we go. > > I have some experience with Phabricator and Arcanist from LLVM and > it's not very good. > > Phabricator (or Arcanist) doesn't support patch series. You can only > submit one patch, or a range of commits as one patch (which is pretty > bad - why would anyone on Earth want to do that). It also doesn't > support downloading patches in the mbox format (only plain diffs). > Based on that, I don't recommend it.
Off-topic indeed. Arcanist is crippled, as you say, and I don't like its UI. But git-phab does exist to let you attach patch series, e.g. https://phabricator.freedesktop.org/T7573 contains a load. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev