On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On 24 January 2017 at 00:54, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> These files belong to the vulkan loader. > > Fully agreed, patch is > > Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com> > > Thanks! > > > Related question: > > I was wondering about getting this a step further: > > - having the loader provide a .pc file > > - tracking required version at configure time and dropping our local > > copies of the headers/xml. > > > > Would you be in favour, against, neutral of such an approach ? > > I'd be in favor of that, but let's see what Jason thinks. > I'd rather not. That would make sense if we all lived in the open-source world where everything is upstream all the time. Unfortunately, not all of us have that luxury and we need to be able to work on experimental branches of the spec that may have more extensions than are provided by any loader version we can install. I'd be ok with a check for a particular loader version just to force distros to update their loader but I would like to be able to build with arbitrary XML branches without having to install a branch of the loader.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
