On 8 February 2017 at 18:03, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Paul Berry <stereotype...@gmail.com> > > Several API functions require special treatment in order to be marshalled > to a background thread. Others can't be safely executed in a background > thread and need to be executed synchronously (e.g. since they return data > through a pointer argument). > > This annotation will be used when code generating thread marshalling code, > to ensure that each function is marshalled in the correct way. > > Note that PixelMap functions are marked as synchronous for now since > their pointer may be relative to buffer on the GPU, so we'll need > special logic to marshal them properly. > > v2: Move description of attribute types to a comment in the dtd file. > --- > src/mapi/glapi/gen/ARB_base_instance.xml | 6 ++-- > .../glapi/gen/ARB_draw_elements_base_vertex.xml | 8 ++--- > src/mapi/glapi/gen/ARB_draw_instanced.xml | 4 +-- > src/mapi/glapi/gen/EXT_transform_feedback.xml | 2 +- > src/mapi/glapi/gen/gl_API.dtd | 11 +++++- > src/mapi/glapi/gen/gl_API.xml | 40 > +++++++++++++--------- Food for thought:
Do we have (m)any extensions which are yet to be implemented that would need the new tag ? Is it worth having a separate black/whitelist -Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
