On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen <b...@basnieuwenhuizen.nl> wrote: > I thought rand() was not thread safe anyway, and hence we can't use it > in mesa as we don't know what application threads call it too?
My manpage says "MT-Safe". > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Timothy Arceri <tarc...@itsqueeze.com> wrote: >> Otherwise we will always remove old cache entries from the same dirs. >> --- >> src/util/disk_cache.c | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/src/util/disk_cache.c b/src/util/disk_cache.c >> index 2a1024a..dc65d52 100644 >> --- a/src/util/disk_cache.c >> +++ b/src/util/disk_cache.c >> @@ -402,20 +402,22 @@ disk_cache_create(const char *gpu_name, const char >> *timestamp) >> cache->max_size = max_size; >> >> /* A limit of 32 jobs was choosen as observations of Deus Ex start-up >> times >> * showed that we reached at most 11 jobs on an Intel i5-6400 CPU@2.70GHz >> * (a fairly modist desktop CPU). 1 thread was choosen because we don't >> * really care about getting things to disk quickly just that it's not >> * blocking other tasks. >> */ >> util_queue_init(&cache->cache_queue, "disk_cache", 32, 1); >> >> + srand(time(NULL)); >> + >> ralloc_free(local); >> >> return cache; >> >> fail: >> if (fd != -1) >> close(fd); >> if (cache) >> ralloc_free(cache); >> ralloc_free(local); >> -- >> 2.9.3 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mesa-dev mailing list >> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
