https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100303
--- Comment #5 from Roland Scheidegger <srol...@vmware.com> ---
(In reply to Timothy Arceri from comment #4)
> (In reply to Roland Scheidegger from comment #2)
> >
> > So, for some reason the compiler completely eliminated the conditional
> > return in the loop inside the branch and figured it will just
> > unconditionally return the value corresponding to not meeting that condition
> > in the loop in the original code. (In fact all code in this function with
> > the exception of the return statement is now effectively dead.)
> > Not sure though which lowering stage did this damage...
>
> I think there is a bug in do_lower_jumps(). I noticed a similar bug when
> working on loop unrolling for NIR. I wrote the following tests that pass on
> NIR unrolling/return lower but fail in GLSL IR.
>
> piglit/tests/spec/glsl-1.10/execution/vs-nested-return-sibling-loop.
> shader_tes
> piglit/tests/spec/glsl-1.10/execution/vs-nested-return-sibling-loop2.
> shader_test
Yes, that looks similar. Thease also have a return in a loop inside a
conditional. Albeit the test case here even works without the sibling loop.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
