On 28 April 2017 at 19:15, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 28 April 2017 at 11:50, Andres Gomez <ago...@igalia.com> wrote: >> Do we want to do this? >> >> According to Travis own doc, there is little to no gain: >> https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/caching/#Things-not-to-cache >> > The packages we use should not be slow to download, although I've not > checked explicitly. It seems counter intuitive to explicitly add apt > caching as an option yet advice against it :-\ > > Let's me give it a spin and see what happens. > Using apt cache is a clear win - not huge one but still.
"make loaders/classic DRI" - 1s "scons SWR" - 6s -Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
