Does this mean that image atomics are broken and radv passes the CTS
anyway? If so, someone should fine a bug against the CTS so we can keep
track of the coverage hole.
On June 30, 2017 3:15:57 AM Alex Smith <asm...@feralinteractive.com> wrote:
The NIR parameters are ordered "compare, data", matching GLSL, but both
the image and buffer LLVM intrinsics take them the other way around.
This is already handled correctly for SSBO atomics.
Signed-off-by: Alex Smith <asm...@feralinteractive.com>
---
src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c b/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c
index 6845df8..89b7103 100644
--- a/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c
+++ b/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c
@@ -3442,9 +3442,9 @@ static LLVMValueRef visit_image_atomic(struct
nir_to_llvm_context *ctx,
abort();
}
- params[param_count++] = get_src(ctx, instr->src[2]);
if (instr->intrinsic == nir_intrinsic_image_atomic_comp_swap)
params[param_count++] = get_src(ctx, instr->src[3]);
+ params[param_count++] = get_src(ctx, instr->src[2]);
if (glsl_get_sampler_dim(type) == GLSL_SAMPLER_DIM_BUF) {
params[param_count++] = get_sampler_desc(ctx, instr->variables[0],
DESC_BUFFER);
--
2.9.4
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
