On Friday, August 4, 2017 12:22:19 PM PDT Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2017-08-04 19:47:14) > > On Friday, July 21, 2017 8:36:42 AM PDT Chris Wilson wrote: > > > Patch reordering from last time so that the cosmetic tweaks are done first > > > and out of the way. Kenneth has reviewed the core NO_RELOC patches, so > > > hopefully it doesn't look too bad and we can land at least as far as > > > there (patch 8/10). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -Chris > > > > I split up some patches and pushed a modified version of this series. > > > > To ssh://git.freedesktop.org/git/mesa/mesa > > 5c007203b73..6c530ad1160 master -> master > > > > Thanks a ton for getting us to NO_RELOC. I really like the new reloc > > flags system as well. It's so much nicer! > > I've still got to win you over to using LUT indices (kernel side, there > shouldn't be any case where it is worse, but the differences are easily > dwarfed in typical cases where it is only about 10% faster, but any > reduction inside the struct_mutex is a must), I see, and the per-context > bo along with removing the auxiliary render_cache set... > > But now for something completely different... > -Chris
I landed I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT too, actually. I definitely want per-context BOs, but Jason and I had come up with some patches for that as well, and I haven't had a chance to compare your approach with ours to see which is better. I hope to do that soon. --Ken
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
