Hi all, On 14 March 2017 at 23:51, Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/14/2017 10:21 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> On 15 March 2017 at 07:17, Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> From: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com> >>> >>> LLVM 4.0 released with a pretty messy regression, that hopefully >>> get fixed in the future. >>> >>> This work around was proposed by Tom, and it fixes the CTS regressions >>> here at least, I'm not sure if this will cause any major side effects, >>> but correctness over speed and all that. >>> >>> radeonsi should possibly consider the same workaround until an llvm >>> fix can be found. >>> >> >> I also deliberately only put this for LLVM 4.0 in the hope llvm will >> get fixed before >> 5 releases. > > > I think you want to make it >= 0x0400 and change it later because it's still > broken with LLVM master. > Did this fix make it for LLVM 5.0 or LLVM 4.0.1? If so, let's adjust the guard accordingly.
Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev