On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 2:31:11 AM PDT Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2017-09-06 01:09:39)
> > Prior to the previous patch, we would pwrite the batchbuffer contents,
> > and wanted to skip the execbuffer if that failed. Now, we write things
> > directly to the map, so we don't need this check.
> > ---
> > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c | 40
> > ++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c
> > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c
> > index 9b37470f926..df094bb6047 100644
> > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c
> > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c
> > @@ -199,8 +199,6 @@ intel_batchbuffer_reset_to_saved(struct brw_context
> > *brw)
> > void
> > intel_batchbuffer_free(struct intel_batchbuffer *batch)
> > {
> > - free(batch->cpu_map);
>
> Stray from previous patch.
> -ChrisFixed locally - squashed it into the previous patch.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
