Am Freitag, den 22.09.2017, 09:22 +0200 schrieb Samuel Pitoiset:
> That's unnecessary to double-check that dcc_offset is not 0
> because all callers already check that.
In that case I would suggest to add an assert(rtex->dcc_offset)
to ensure this.
Best,
Gert
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com>
> ---
> src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_blit.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_blit.c
> b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_blit.c
> index 0ecfc83fe2..2c846d2914 100644
> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_blit.c
> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_blit.c
> @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ static void si_blit_decompress_color(struct
> pipe_context *ctx,
> "Decompress Color (levels %u - %u, mask
> 0x%x)\n\n",
> first_level, last_level, level_mask);
>
> - if (rtex->dcc_offset && need_dcc_decompress) {
> + if (need_dcc_decompress) {
> custom_blend = sctx->custom_blend_dcc_decompress;
>
> /* disable levels without DCC */
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
