Hi Emil, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 23 October 2017 at 11:50, Harish Krupo <harish.krupo....@intel.com> wrote: >> This passes 33/37 deqp tests related to partial_update, 4 are not >> supported. Tests not supported: >> dEQP-EGL.functional.negative_partial_update.not_postable_surface >> dEQP-EGL.functional.negative_partial_update.not_current_surface >> dEQP-EGL.functional.negative_partial_update.buffer_preserved >> dEQP-EGL.functional.negative_partial_update.not_current_surface2 >> Reason: No matching egl config found. >> >> v2: Remove unnecessary return statement. Keep function names >> consistent. (Emil Velikov) >> Add not supported list to commit message. (Eric Engestrom) >> >> v3: Remove explicit with_damage variable. (Eric Engestrom) >> > Did you send the wrong version by any chance? > The summary does not reflect the actual changes. > Sorry, should have actually been: v3: Remove explicit with_damage variable and swap_buffers_common function. Make SwapBuffers and SwapBuffersWithDamage(NULL,0) equivalent in behavior. Fix called via comment for swap_buffers_with_damage. (Eric Engestrom) Rework try_buffer_damage into set_damage_region as it is being called only from set_damage_region. > Why did you rework try_damage_buffer into dri2_wl_set_damage_region? > It seems harder to follow over the previous patches. > As try_damage_buffer was being used only in dri2_wl_set_damage_region and swap_buffers_with_damage was calling set_damage_region so I removed the unnecessary (extra) call to try_damage_region from set_damage_region and reworked try_damage_region to set_damage_region. Do we need to keep try_damage_region? If so, I will break them into two separate functions. > >> @@ -928,7 +944,8 @@ dri2_wl_query_buffer_age(_EGLDriver *drv, >> static EGLBoolean >> dri2_wl_swap_buffers(_EGLDriver *drv, _EGLDisplay *disp, _EGLSurface *draw) >> { >> - return dri2_wl_swap_buffers_with_damage(drv, disp, draw, NULL, 0); >> + return dri2_wl_swap_buffers_with_damage(drv, disp, draw, >> + NULL, 0); > > Unrelated noop change. > I had previously broken it into two lines to accomodate the EGL_TRUE change. After removing it I forgot to set it back to the same line. Will fix this. Thank you Regards Harish Krupo > Thanks > Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev