This seems trivially correct, so this patch is Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.roman...@intel.com>
On 11/28/2017 04:13 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > The intention here is make the new BO use the same alignment as the old > BO. This isn't strictly necessary, but we would have to update the > 'alignment' field in the validation list when swapping it out, and we > don't bother today. > > The batch and state buffers use an alignment of 4096, so this should be > equivalent - it's just clearer than cut and pasting a magic constant. > > Fixes: 2dfc119f22f257082ab0 "i965: Grow the batch/state buffers if we need > space and can't flush." > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103101 > --- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c > index 1d0292b4b80..2071faf85c2 100644 > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c > @@ -302,7 +302,8 @@ grow_buffer(struct brw_context *brw, > uint32_t *old_map = *map_ptr; > struct brw_bo *old_bo = *bo_ptr; > > - struct brw_bo *new_bo = brw_bo_alloc(bufmgr, old_bo->name, new_size, > 4096); > + struct brw_bo *new_bo = > + brw_bo_alloc(bufmgr, old_bo->name, new_size, old_bo->align); > uint32_t *new_map; > > perf_debug("Growing %s - ran out of space\n", old_bo->name); > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
