This patch passes Intel's CI suites.
It needs a CC for stable in the commit message.

Tested-by: Mark Janes <mark.a.ja...@intel.com>

Sergii Romantsov <sergii.romant...@gmail.com> writes:

> Gen8+ use 48-bit address relocations so need to extend the sign
> to 64-bit return value. Without it we have higher bits zeroed
> and missing the negavive values.
> Haswell and older use 32-bit deltas so are unaffected by this issue.
>
> v2:
>   used int32_t fucntion parameter instead of explicit type conversion.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101408
> Signed-off-by: Sergii Romantsov <sergii.romant...@globallogic.com>
> Tested-by: Andriy Khulap <andriy.khu...@globallogic.com>
> ---
>  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c 
> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c
> index ebc02ff..7286140 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c
> @@ -1079,7 +1079,7 @@ brw_batch_references(struct intel_batchbuffer *batch, 
> struct brw_bo *bo)
>  static uint64_t
>  emit_reloc(struct intel_batchbuffer *batch,
>             struct brw_reloc_list *rlist, uint32_t offset,
> -           struct brw_bo *target, uint32_t target_offset,
> +           struct brw_bo *target, int32_t target_offset,
>             unsigned int reloc_flags)
>  {
>     assert(target != NULL);
> -- 
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to