On 2018-05-25 10:38, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 5:33 PM Robert Foss <robert.f...@collabora.com>
wrote:
Hey,
On 2018-05-25 02:17, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 6:23 AM, Robert Foss <robert.f...@collabora.com>
wrote:
Hey,
I don't think I've received any feedback on this version yet.
If anyone has some time to spare, it would be nice to get it merged.
Just to be clear about the libdrm branch linked in the cover letter,
it is not required. Only for virgl platforms which happens to be what
I tested on.
virgl will still fallback to using the first render node without those
libdrm changes, right? If not, I don't think we should apply until
we're not breaking a platform...
No it will not fall back. I agree that holding off makes more sense.
What's the reason of this problems? Is it because of drmGetDevices()? Since
we don't really use it for anything other than getting the list of render
nodes in the system, maybe we could just iterate over any /dev/renderD*
nodes explicitly and avoid introducing new problems?
That's exactly the problem, and yes we could 100% solve by iterating over
/dev/renderD* nodes. I originally assumed we wouldn't want to do that, but
rather use the libdrm interfaces.
But for the next spin I could avoid using libdrm, should I?
Rob.
Best regards,
Tomasz
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
