On Sun, 2018-07-01 at 18:32 -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> 1-3 are R-b me. Should we cc stable?
Yes, I think these should go to stable.
> On June 29, 2018 03:11:00 Iago Toral Quiroga <ito...@igalia.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Every time we emit a new state base address we will need to re-emit
> > our
> > binding tables, since they might have been emitted with a different
> > base
> > state adress.
> > ---
> > src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c
> > b/src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c
> > index 66d1ef7d786..611311904e6 100644
> > --- a/src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c
> > +++ b/src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c
> > @@ -67,6 +67,11 @@ genX(cmd_buffer_emit_state_base_address)(struct
> > anv_cmd_buffer *cmd_buffer)
> > {
> > struct anv_device *device = cmd_buffer->device;
> >
> > + /* If we are emitting a new state base address we probably need
> > to re-emit
> > + * binding tables.
> > + */
> > + cmd_buffer->state.descriptors_dirty |= ~0;
> > +
> > /* Emit a render target cache flush.
> > *
> > * This isn't documented anywhere in the PRM. However, it seems
> > to be
> > --
> > 2.14.1
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
