Hey Linoel, Lionel Landwerlin wrote on 20.08.2018 11:19: > On 20/08/18 09:16, Kai Wasserbäch wrote: >> Lionel Landwerlin wrote on 19.08.2018 11:05: >>> Patches 6, 7, 10 & 11 are : >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwer...@intel.com> >> thanks! Feel free to push, I don't have commit access (see cover letter). > > Will do.
thanks! >>> There are 2 existing series touching the same code, in patches 8, 9 & 12, I >>> think should land before the warnings are fixed. >> Hm, I can see why you might want to hold off on 8 and 9 then, but 12 >> shouldn't >> break anything, should it? It might even work as a fixup for your other >> series? >> Anyway, I can carry those three over to the next series, once I get most of >> this >> into master. 😉 > > It clashes with this one : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48139/ Ah, I see. Patch 12 from this series wouldn't be needed at all afterwards, since result would be the return value then. Let's abandon this one then. 🙂 Cheers, Kai
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev