Hey Linoel,
Lionel Landwerlin wrote on 20.08.2018 11:19:
> On 20/08/18 09:16, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
>> Lionel Landwerlin wrote on 19.08.2018 11:05:
>>> Patches 6, 7, 10 & 11 are :
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwer...@intel.com>
>> thanks! Feel free to push, I don't have commit access (see cover letter).
> 
> Will do.

thanks!

>>> There are 2 existing series touching the same code, in patches 8, 9 & 12, I
>>> think should land before the warnings are fixed.
>> Hm, I can see why you might want to hold off on 8 and 9 then, but 12 
>> shouldn't
>> break anything, should it? It might even work as a fixup for your other 
>> series?
>> Anyway, I can carry those three over to the next series, once I get most of 
>> this
>> into master. 😉
> 
> It clashes with this one : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48139/

Ah, I see. Patch 12 from this series wouldn't be needed at all afterwards, since
result would be the return value then. Let's abandon this one then. 🙂

Cheers,
Kai

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to