Doesn't matter too much On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 3:45 PM Andres Gomez <ago...@igalia.com> wrote:
> Lionel, should we also include this in the stable queues ? > > > On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 16:47 +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote: > > We're hitting an assert in gfxbench because one of the local variable > > is a sampler (according to Jason this isn't valid) : > > > > testfw_app: ../src/compiler/nir_types.cpp:551: void > glsl_get_natural_size_align_bytes(const glsl_type*, unsigned int*, unsigned > int*): Assertion `!"type does not have a natural size"' failed. > > > > Since this particular variable isn't used and it can be eliminated by > > removing unused local variables in the optimization pass. This makes > > sense also for valid local variables. > > > > v2: Move additional local variable removal out of optimization loop, > > but before large constant removal (Jason/Lionel) > > > > Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwer...@intel.com> > > --- > > src/intel/compiler/brw_nir.c | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/src/intel/compiler/brw_nir.c b/src/intel/compiler/brw_nir.c > > index ef5034d1e1e..8c1bcb99f8c 100644 > > --- a/src/intel/compiler/brw_nir.c > > +++ b/src/intel/compiler/brw_nir.c > > @@ -673,6 +673,11 @@ brw_preprocess_nir(const struct brw_compiler > *compiler, nir_shader *nir) > > > > nir = brw_nir_optimize(nir, compiler, is_scalar, true); > > > > + /* Workaround Gfxbench unused local sampler variable which will > trigger an > > + * assert in the opt_large_constants pass. > > + */ > > + OPT(nir_remove_dead_variables, nir_var_local); > > + > > /* This needs to be run after the first optimization pass but before > we > > * lower indirect derefs away > > */ > -- > Br, > > Andres >
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
