Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> writes: > The CTS requires a 565-no-depth-no-stencil config for ES 3.0, but at depth > 24 of X11 we wouldn't do so. We can satisfy that bad requirement using a > pbuffer-only visual with whatever other buffers the driver happens to have > given us.
Anyone? Still concerned about getting Mesa to pass the current conformance suite.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
