Hello, I tested this patch few times and have the following results: https://mesa-ci.01.org/global_logic/builds/38/group/63a9f0ea7bb98050796b649e85481845 https://mesa-ci.01.org/global_logic/builds/41/group/63a9f0ea7bb98050796b649e85481845 https://mesa-ci.01.org/global_logic/builds/43/group/63a9f0ea7bb98050796b649e85481845
All test runs are finished with the following issue on G965: https://mesa-ci.01.org/global_logic/builds/38/results/46496330 ext_framebuffer_multisample-accuracy all_samples srgb small depthstencil linear -auto -fbo .... ERROR: This test passed when it expected failure Note: Also I checked latest mesa master few times and there was no regression: https://mesa-ci.01.org/global_logic/builds/42/group/63a9f0ea7bb98050796b649e85481845 Regards, Andrii. On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 9:48 AM <asimiklit.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Andrii Simiklit <andrii.simik...@globallogic.com> > > There's no point reverting to the last saved point if that save point is > the empty batch, we will just repeat ourselves. > > v2: Merge with new commits, changes was minimized, added the 'fixes' tag > v3: Added in to patch series > v4: Fixed the regression which was introduced by this patch > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108630 > Reported-by: Mark Janes <mark.a.ja...@intel.com> > The solution provided by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> > > CC: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Fixes: 3faf56ffbdeb "intel: Add an interface for saving/restoring > the batchbuffer state." > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107626 > Signed-off-by: Andrii Simiklit <andrii.simik...@globallogic.com> > --- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_compute.c | 3 ++- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c | 3 ++- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/genX_blorp_exec.c | 1 + > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c | 7 +++++++ > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.h | 1 + > 5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_compute.c > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_compute.c > index de08fc3ac1..5c8e3a5d4d 100644 > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_compute.c > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_compute.c > @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static void > brw_dispatch_compute_common(struct gl_context *ctx) > { > struct brw_context *brw = brw_context(ctx); > - bool fail_next = false; > + bool fail_next; > > if (!_mesa_check_conditional_render(ctx)) > return; > @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ brw_dispatch_compute_common(struct gl_context *ctx) > intel_batchbuffer_require_space(brw, 600); > brw_require_statebuffer_space(brw, 2500); > intel_batchbuffer_save_state(brw); > + fail_next = intel_batchbuffer_saved_state_is_empty(brw); > > retry: > brw->batch.no_wrap = true; > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c > index 8536c04010..19ee3962d7 100644 > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c > @@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ brw_draw_single_prim(struct gl_context *ctx, > { > struct brw_context *brw = brw_context(ctx); > const struct gen_device_info *devinfo = &brw->screen->devinfo; > - bool fail_next = false; > + bool fail_next; > > /* Flag BRW_NEW_DRAW_CALL on every draw. This allows us to have > * atoms that happen on every draw call. > @@ -898,6 +898,7 @@ brw_draw_single_prim(struct gl_context *ctx, > intel_batchbuffer_require_space(brw, 1500); > brw_require_statebuffer_space(brw, 2400); > intel_batchbuffer_save_state(brw); > + fail_next = intel_batchbuffer_saved_state_is_empty(brw); > > if (brw->num_instances != prim->num_instances || > brw->basevertex != prim->basevertex || > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/genX_blorp_exec.c > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/genX_blorp_exec.c > index 34bfcad03e..a62b88e166 100644 > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/genX_blorp_exec.c > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/genX_blorp_exec.c > @@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ retry: > intel_batchbuffer_require_space(brw, 1400); > brw_require_statebuffer_space(brw, 600); > intel_batchbuffer_save_state(brw); > + check_aperture_failed_once |= > intel_batchbuffer_saved_state_is_empty(brw); > brw->batch.no_wrap = true; > > #if GEN_GEN == 6 > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c > index 8b769eaf53..6207de5a06 100644 > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c > @@ -301,6 +301,13 @@ intel_batchbuffer_save_state(struct brw_context *brw) > brw->batch.saved.exec_count = brw->batch.exec_count; > } > > +bool > +intel_batchbuffer_saved_state_is_empty(struct brw_context *brw) > +{ > + struct intel_batchbuffer *batch = &brw->batch; > + return (batch->saved.map_next == batch->batch.map); > +} > + > void > intel_batchbuffer_reset_to_saved(struct brw_context *brw) > { > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.h > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.h > index 0632142cd3..91720dad5b 100644 > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.h > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.h > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct intel_batchbuffer; > void intel_batchbuffer_init(struct brw_context *brw); > void intel_batchbuffer_free(struct intel_batchbuffer *batch); > void intel_batchbuffer_save_state(struct brw_context *brw); > +bool intel_batchbuffer_saved_state_is_empty(struct brw_context *brw); > void intel_batchbuffer_reset_to_saved(struct brw_context *brw); > void intel_batchbuffer_require_space(struct brw_context *brw, GLuint sz); > int _intel_batchbuffer_flush_fence(struct brw_context *brw, > -- > 2.17.1 > >
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev