Rob Clark <robdcl...@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 5:25 PM Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote:
>>
>> Rob Clark <robdcl...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > If we can't clear all the buffers with pctx->clear() (say, for example,
>> > because of ColorMask), push the buffers we *can* clear with pctx->clear()
>> > first.  Tilers want to see clears coming before draws to enable fast-
>> > paths, and clearing one of the attachments with a quad-draw first
>> > confuses that logic.
>>
>> Oh, nice!
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net>
>>
>> Though it feels pretty silly that the ->clear() caller needs a
>> clear_with_quad implementation when the ->clear() implementation in the
>> driver also needs a clear_with_quad implementation for non-fast-cleared
>> buffers.  :/
>
> hmm, so perhaps one easy option is to change pctx->clear() to return a
> boolean, so driver can return false to ask the state tracker to do a
> clear_with_quad()..  maybe that would be a first step towards allowing
> driver to handle clears w/ colormask and possibly scissor (although
> for the later, plus
> glInvalidateFramebuffer()/glInvalidateSubFramebuffer(), I was thinking
> of pctx->invalidate_surface()/pctx->invalidate_sub_surface()).

I was thinking you'd return the mask of what buffers you couldn't (fast)
clear.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to