On 12/5/18 1:01 PM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 12:54 AM Kevin Strasser <kevin.stras...@intel.com> wrote:

Android P and earlier expect that the surface supports storage images, and
so many of the tests fail when the framework checks for that support. The
framework also includes various image format and usage combinations that are
invalid for the hardware.

Drop the STORAGE restriction from the HAL and whitelist a pair of
formats so that existing versions of Android can pass these tests.

Fixes:
    dEQP-VK.wsi.android.*

Signed-off-by: Kevin Strasser <kevin.stras...@intel.com>
---
  src/intel/vulkan/anv_android.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_android.c b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_android.c
index 46c41d5..e2640b8 100644
--- a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_android.c
+++ b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_android.c
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ VkResult anv_GetSwapchainGrallocUsageANDROID(
     *grallocUsage = 0;
     intel_logd("%s: format=%d, usage=0x%x", __func__, format, imageUsage);

-   /* WARNING: Android Nougat's libvulkan.so hardcodes the VkImageUsageFlags
+   /* WARNING: Android's libvulkan.so hardcodes the VkImageUsageFlags
      * returned to applications via 
VkSurfaceCapabilitiesKHR::supportedUsageFlags.
      * The relevant code in libvulkan/swapchain.cpp contains this fun comment:
      *
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ VkResult anv_GetSwapchainGrallocUsageANDROID(
      * dEQP-VK.wsi.android.swapchain.*.image_usage to fail.
      */

-   const VkPhysicalDeviceImageFormatInfo2KHR image_format_info = {
+   VkPhysicalDeviceImageFormatInfo2KHR image_format_info = {

Why remove the const here?

        .sType = VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_PHYSICAL_DEVICE_IMAGE_FORMAT_INFO_2_KHR,
        .format = format,
        .type = VK_IMAGE_TYPE_2D,
@@ -255,6 +255,17 @@ VkResult anv_GetSwapchainGrallocUsageANDROID(
        .usage = imageUsage,
     };

+   /* Android P and earlier doesn't check if the physical device supports a
+    * given format and usage combination before calling this function. Omit the
+    * storage requirement to make the tests pass.
+    */
+#if ANDROID_API_LEVEL <= 28
+   if (format == VK_FORMAT_R8G8B8A8_SRGB ||
+       format == VK_FORMAT_R5G6B5_UNORM_PACK16) {
+      image_format_info.usage &= ~VK_IMAGE_USAGE_STORAGE_BIT;
+   }
+#endif

I don't think you need this. Per the vulkan spec you can only use an
format + usage combination for a swapchain if it is supported per
ImageFormatProperties, using essentially the same check happening
above. I know CTs has been bad at this, but Vulkan CTS should have
been fixed for a bit now. (I don't think all the fixes are in Android
CTS 9.0_r4 yet, maybe the next release?)

AFAIK the problem here is not about CTS. It's the swapchain implementation that always requires storage support.

(Also silently removing the usage bit is bad, because the app could
try actually using images stores with the image ...)

True, it is not nice ..


+
     VkImageFormatProperties2KHR image_format_props = {
        .sType = VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_IMAGE_FORMAT_PROPERTIES_2_KHR,
     };
@@ -268,19 +279,13 @@ VkResult anv_GetSwapchainGrallocUsageANDROID(
                         "inside %s", __func__);
     }

-   /* Reject STORAGE here to avoid complexity elsewhere. */
-   if (imageUsage & VK_IMAGE_USAGE_STORAGE_BIT) {
-      return vk_errorf(device->instance, device, VK_ERROR_FORMAT_NOT_SUPPORTED,
-                       "VK_IMAGE_USAGE_STORAGE_BIT unsupported for gralloc "
-                       "swapchain");
-   }
-
     if (unmask32(&imageUsage, VK_IMAGE_USAGE_TRANSFER_DST_BIT |
                               VK_IMAGE_USAGE_COLOR_ATTACHMENT_BIT))
        *grallocUsage |= GRALLOC_USAGE_HW_RENDER;

     if (unmask32(&imageUsage, VK_IMAGE_USAGE_TRANSFER_SRC_BIT |
                               VK_IMAGE_USAGE_SAMPLED_BIT |
+                             VK_IMAGE_USAGE_STORAGE_BIT |
                               VK_IMAGE_USAGE_INPUT_ATTACHMENT_BIT))
        *grallocUsage |= GRALLOC_USAGE_HW_TEXTURE;

--
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to