Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2019-01-11 09:05:21) > I'm putting my own thoughts in a reply for some reason. Here's what I've > seen. > > 1. I really like GitLab "discussions". It provides a very good way for both > the author and the reviewers to keep track of what review comments have been > dealt with and what comments are still outstanding. > > 2. GitLab is currently missing a good way to comment on commit messages which > makes giving review tags rather painful. There is a GitLab issue opened about > this: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/38602 > > 3. GitLab has a bug regarding per-commit comments where they tend to get lost > while you're looking at the commit itself: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ > gitlab-ce/issues/53175 > > 4. At least two of those merge requests were small bug fixes by brand new > contributors who I've never seen on the mailing list. > > 5. There's no way with gitlab for Reviewed-by tags to get automatically > applied as part of the merging process. This makes merging a bit more manual > than it needs to be but is really no worse than it was before. > > Ok, there you have my thoughts. I'd be happy to hear others. > > --Jason > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:57 AM Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> wrote: > > All, > > The mesa project has now hit 100 merge requests (36 are still open). I > (and I'm sure others) would be curious to hear people's initial thoughts > on > the process. What's working well? What's not working? Is it total fail > and should we go back to mailing lists? > > --Jason >
Your assessment matches pretty closely with mine. Dylan
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
