IMHO this is done at the wrong level. You're effectively keeping track
of a per-variable "this variable belongs to a tcs output that's not a
patch" bit. Doesn't seem worthy of a whole separate bit.

Also, you use ->without_array() a lot, but what you really need to do
is remove *one* layer of array-ness, since with AoA there could be
multiple.

There's already a function in link_varyings.cpp called
"get_varying_type()" I believe it does what you want.

Cheers,

  -ilia

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 12:20 PM Chema Casanova <jmcasan...@igalia.com> wrote:
>
> Ping.
>
> El 22/11/18 a las 0:28, Chema Casanova escribió:
> >
> >
> > On 21/11/18 20:04, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 1:45 PM Jose Maria Casanova Crespo
> >> <jmcasan...@igalia.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Recent change on OpenGL CTS ("Use non-arrayed varying name for TCS 
> >>> blocks")
> >>> on KHR-GL*.tessellation_shader.single.xfb_captures_data_from_correct_stage
> >>> tests changed how to name per-vertex Tessellation Control Shader output
> >>> varyings in transform feedback using interface block as 
> >>> "BLOCK_INOUT.value"
> >>> rather than "BLOCK_INOUT[0].value"
> >>>
> >>> So Tessellation control shader per-vertex output variables and blocks that
> >>> are required to be declared as arrays, with each element representing 
> >>> output
> >>> values for a single vertex of a multi-vertex primitive are expected to be
> >>> named as they were not declared as arrays.
> >>>
> >>> This patch adds a new is_xfb_per_vertex_output flag at ir_variable level 
> >>> so
> >>> we mark when an ir_variable is an per-vertex TCS output varying. So we
> >>> treat it in terms on XFB its naming as a non array variable.
> >>>
> >>> As we don't support NV_gpu_shader5, so PATCHES mode is not accepted as
> >>> primitiveMode parameter of BeginTransformFeedback the test expects a
> >>> failure as we can use the XFB results.
> >>>
> >>> This patch uncovers that we were passing the GLES version of the tests
> >>> because candidates naming didn't match, not because on GLES the 
> >>> Tessellation
> >>> Control stage varyings shouldn't be XFB candidates in any case. This
> >>> is addressed in the following patch.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 
> >>> KHR-GL4*.tessellation_shader.single.xfb_captures_data_from_correct_stage
> >>>
> >>> Cc: mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org
> >>> ---
> >>>  src/compiler/glsl/ir.cpp            | 1 +
> >>>  src/compiler/glsl/ir.h              | 6 ++++++
> >>>  src/compiler/glsl/link_uniforms.cpp | 6 ++++--
> >>>  src/compiler/glsl/link_varyings.cpp | 8 +++++++-
> >>>  4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/src/compiler/glsl/ir.cpp b/src/compiler/glsl/ir.cpp
> >>> index 1d1a56ae9a5..582111d71f5 100644
> >>> --- a/src/compiler/glsl/ir.cpp
> >>> +++ b/src/compiler/glsl/ir.cpp
> >>> @@ -1750,6 +1750,7 @@ ir_variable::ir_variable(const struct glsl_type 
> >>> *type, const char *name,
> >>>     this->data.fb_fetch_output = false;
> >>>     this->data.bindless = false;
> >>>     this->data.bound = false;
> >>> +   this->data.is_xfb_per_vertex_output = false;
> >>>
> >>>     if (type != NULL) {
> >>>        if (type->is_interface())
> >>> diff --git a/src/compiler/glsl/ir.h b/src/compiler/glsl/ir.h
> >>> index f478b29a6b5..e09f053b77c 100644
> >>> --- a/src/compiler/glsl/ir.h
> >>> +++ b/src/compiler/glsl/ir.h
> >>> @@ -766,6 +766,12 @@ public:
> >>>         */
> >>>        unsigned is_xfb_only:1;
> >>>
> >>> +      /**
> >>> +       * Is this varying a TSC per-vertex output candidate for transform
> >>
> >> TCS?
> >
> >
> > Yes. I've fixed it locally at the commit summary too.
> >
> >
> >>> +       * feedback?
> >>> +       */
> >>> +      unsigned is_xfb_per_vertex_output:1;
> >>> +
> >>>        /**
> >>>         * Was a transfor feedback buffer set in the shader?
> >>
> >> ugh, not your problem, but "transform" :(
> >>
> >>>         */
> >>> diff --git a/src/compiler/glsl/link_uniforms.cpp 
> >>> b/src/compiler/glsl/link_uniforms.cpp
> >>> index 63e688b19a7..547da68e216 100644
> >>> --- a/src/compiler/glsl/link_uniforms.cpp
> >>> +++ b/src/compiler/glsl/link_uniforms.cpp
> >>> @@ -72,8 +72,10 @@ program_resource_visitor::process(ir_variable *var, 
> >>> bool use_std430_as_default)
> >>>           get_internal_ifc_packing(use_std430_as_default) :
> >>>        var->type->get_internal_ifc_packing(use_std430_as_default);
> >>>
> >>> -   const glsl_type *t =
> >>> -      var->data.from_named_ifc_block ? var->get_interface_type() : 
> >>> var->type;
> >>> +   const glsl_type *t = var->data.from_named_ifc_block ?
> >>> +      (var->data.is_xfb_per_vertex_output ?
> >>> +       var->get_interface_type()->without_array() :
> >>> +       var->get_interface_type()) : var->type;
> >>>     const glsl_type *t_without_array = t->without_array();
> >>>
> >>>     /* false is always passed for the row_major parameter to the other
> >>> diff --git a/src/compiler/glsl/link_varyings.cpp 
> >>> b/src/compiler/glsl/link_varyings.cpp
> >>> index 52e493cb599..1964dcc0a22 100644
> >>> --- a/src/compiler/glsl/link_varyings.cpp
> >>> +++ b/src/compiler/glsl/link_varyings.cpp
> >>> @@ -2150,7 +2150,10 @@ private:
> >>>        tfeedback_candidate *candidate
> >>>           = rzalloc(this->mem_ctx, tfeedback_candidate);
> >>>        candidate->toplevel_var = this->toplevel_var;
> >>> -      candidate->type = type;
> >>> +      if (this->toplevel_var->data.is_xfb_per_vertex_output)
> >>> +         candidate->type = type->without_array();
> >>> +      else
> >>> +         candidate->type = type;
> >>>        candidate->offset = this->varying_floats;
> >>>        _mesa_hash_table_insert(this->tfeedback_candidates,
> >>>                                ralloc_strdup(this->mem_ctx, name),
> >>> @@ -2499,6 +2502,9 @@ assign_varying_locations(struct gl_context *ctx,
> >>>
> >>>           if (num_tfeedback_decls > 0) {
> >>>              tfeedback_candidate_generator g(mem_ctx, 
> >>> tfeedback_candidates);
> >>> +            if (producer->Stage == MESA_SHADER_TESS_CTRL &&
> >>> +                !output_var->data.patch)
> >>> +               output_var->data.is_xfb_per_vertex_output = true;
> >>>              g.process(output_var);
> >>>           }
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> 2.19.1
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> mesa-dev mailing list
> >>> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> >>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > mesa-dev mailing list
> > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
> >
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to