Am Freitag, den 11.10.2019, 09:47 -0700 schrieb Dylan Baker: > > I prefer this to <year>.<any> > > To echo Dave's concern, if we ever decided to have a non-backwards > compatible API change (say Intel decided that since we don't use > libdrm_intel anymore we don't want to maintain it and want to drop > it) we'd need to be able to bump the major version to signal that to > downstreams.
With my Debian developer hat on: an API/ABI change should be signalled by a change of the library major SO version - downstream will note this, the version of the tarball as such is secondary. It is also a good idea to increment the minor version whenever a new interface is added (I guess this is the second part of what Dave was referring to). Best, Gert _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
