On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 21:08, Gert Wollny <gw.foss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Dave,
>
> I was wondering how much interest you still have in R600? I'm preparing
> to start feeding my NIR work as MRs to continue my work in-tree. It is
> currently only for Evergreen and still far from feature parity
> with TGSI (no tesselation, no images, nor SSBOs), some things regress,
> but some things are also fixed, so obviously the backend will only be
> enabled on explicit request.
>
> Before that I'd like to un-tabbify the whole r600 driver code, because
> all the other parts of mesa I've been touching use spaces, and it makes
> it more convenient to have the same WS handling everywhere.
>
> Whould this be okay with you?

I'm not against it from a style point of view, but from a it totally
breaks git history, blame, cherry-picking and many other useful things
I'd really ask you to reconsider and just use editorconfig. Maybe r600
is quiet enough now we don't have to worry about that much backports
or cherry-pick, so I'll leave it up to you.

At least leave sb alone since we probably want to kill that someday if
your NIR backend gets there, and I doubt you want to touch it too much
either.

Dave.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to