On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 16:18 +0200, Eric Engestrom wrote: > On Thursday, 2020-05-07 16:07:00 +0200, Erik Faye-Lund wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 09:05 -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > Looks shiny but.... > > > > > > We need to be very careful here. One of the big no-nos with > > > Khronos > > > trademark rules is using logos for things where implementations > > > aren't > > > conformant. Mesa has been living in a mirky in-between land for > > > a > > > while and everything has been mostly fine. We've been very > > > careful > > > to > > > *not* say that Mesa is an implementation of any Khronos APIs. > > > Instead, we say that Mesa is an open-source software project that > > > contains implementations and that some of those implementations > > > are > > > conformant. That page full of logos makes me concerned that > > > we're > > > going to risk getting into trouble. Khronos marketing cares A > > > LOT > > > about logos. > > > > As I wrote in the e-mail, I've already clarified the logo-usage > > with > > Khronos. They are happy with it as-is. > > Could you post their concerns/guidelines here, so that we can all > know > what can and cannot be on the website and make sure we never cross > the > line with future changes?
You can find their logo guidelines here: https://www.khronos.org/legal/trademarks/ But because Mesa is in a special eternal conformant/non-conformant limbo, I sent an email to clarify. I've posted the response I got here: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/snippets/996 I think the first link is going to be what most people care about, though. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev