On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Christoph Bumiller <e0425...@student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > On 07.09.2012 12:30, Jose Fonseca wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Jose Fonseca <jfons...@vmware.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Matt, >>>> >>>> I see you went ahead and just disabled it. Please remove it all >>>> together. >>>> >>>> Touching code that is not built nor tested ends just silently >>>> introduces bugs, so keeping this around won't help bring it back >>>> one day in any way. >>>> >>>> Jose >>> >>> I talked with both Marek and Christoph, and they both said they'd >>> prefer to simply disable the build. I don't feel strongly, but if >>> someone is to revive it it'd be nice if we didn't make the git >>> history >>> harder to follow. >> >> I suppose they have their arguments, and I hope they include making this >> build again shortly. What I don't understand is why these talks didn't >> happen within this email thread. I'd expect at least a heads up email before >> committing this... >> > > Actually I didn't express any preference. I can't say when or even if > I'll work on d3d1x again, and I don't care about making it build in the > meantime, since it isn't useful for anyone without further improvements. > > (Like working translation of SM4 to TGSI; my passing SM4 to the driver > directly works much better right now, but is too "evil" to push upstream).
Oh, that's not how it seemed on IRC. [13:11] < mattst88> | calim, mareko: what do you think about disabling the d3d1x build vs just removing d3d1x? [13:28] < calim> | mattst88: yeah disable it, I don't have time to work on it and therefore I don't have the nerve to care about whether it builds or not _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
