On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Thierry Reding > <thierry.red...@avionic-design.de> wrote: >> The builtin_compiler binary is used during the build process to generate >> code for the builtin GLSL functions. Since this binary needs to be run >> on the build host, it must not be cross-compiled. >> >> This patch fixes the build system to compile a second version of the >> source files and the builtin_compiler binary itself for the build >> system. It does so by defining the CC_FOR_BUILD and CXX_FOR_BUILD >> variables, which are searched for by the configure script and point to >> the location of native C and C++ compilers. >> --- > > I wish you'd sent this to the list a bit more promptly since the last > update to bug 44618 eight months ago. As it is now, I've got a large > (100) patch series in progress that touches these Makefile.am's. > > Overall, it looks pretty good. I'm very glad to learn about the AX_ > macros. I feel much better adding those to Mesa's build system than > macros like we have now (see MESA_PIC_FLAGS). > > I'd like it if this could be made a patch on top of my > automake-gallium series, > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~mattst88/mesa/log/?h=automake-gallium
One other question: do you want to be able to do a cross-compile from git? If not, we could add builtin_function.cpp to the distribution list and have it provided in Mesa tarballs. That would remove the need for this, at the cost of not being able to cross compile sources checked out of git. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
