On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 01:06 +0100, Marek Olšák wrote: > > ([rant]We should really have an unmappable portion of VRAM as a > feature, because unmappable memory is cool: the memory can be > reclaimed immediately after texture deletion even if the texture is > busy, because the CPU can't access it, and thanks to that, ttm_bo_wait > could be a no-op for all unmappable resources[/rant]).
FWIW, that doesn't require a separate unmappable domain but 'just' that TTM allows more asynchronous GPU operations. Thomas had plans for that a long time ago, don't know what happened to them. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
