On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> wrote: > On 04/16/2013 09:58 AM, Matt Turner wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Chia-I Wu <olva...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> If there is no objection, I'd like to merge it in a day or two. >> >> >> My only objection is over adding a driver that is explicitly a toy, >> the confusion it will cause users, and the developer time it will >> waste. It wasn't uncommon for a user to waste a nontrivial amount of >> someone's time in #intel-gfx only to discover that they were trying to >> use the (old) i965g driver that no one maintained. > > > That's very true. > > I wonder, should i965g be built by default? Or should you have to > explicitly request it via --with-gallium-drivers=i965? The thinking is that > the default should be to build the drivers most people want to use.
The old i965g driver wasn't built by default. It still caused confusion and wasted time. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
