On 04/23/2013 09:19 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
Chad Versace <chad.vers...@linux.intel.com> writes:
On 04/23/2013 06:19 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 04/23/2013 03:28 AM, Chad Versace wrote:
This allows maintainers/packagers/testers to tag the build with
information that will be reported by GL_VERSION.
If the environemt variable or make variable MESA_VERSION_STRING_EXTRA is
environment
set, then its values will appear in the GL_VERSION string immediately
after "Mesa X.Y" and before "(git-xxxxxxx)".
This patch implements supports MESA_VERSION_STRING_EXTRA only for Android.
Other build systems are left as an excercise.
Why is this useful?
The commit message says why: it allows packagers to tag the build with info
that gets reported by GL_VERSION.
How is it used now? The Mesa that gets shipped bi-weekly internally in Intel
for Android is not a snapshot of master nor of any stable branch. Yet, that
snapshot of Mesa is "official", as far as Intel's Android efforts are concerned.
The Android team is using this patch to inject into GL_VERSION the name of the
bi-weekly
Android release.
Without this patch, you may one day get a bug report that says: "This bug exists
in Mesa 9.2-devel (git-xxxxxxx)". Then, you will search for the git sha1, and
unable to find it, yell bloody murder and close the bug as invalid. With this
patch, though, you may get a bug report that says: "This bug exists in
Mesa 9.2-devel otc-android-2013-04-23-blah (git-xxxxxxx)", and then you
will know how to find that Mesa.
So along with a useless sha1, I have a useless date that doesn't tell me
what Mesa it was actually based off of. I say this having tried to
figure out what Mesa actually got used in one of these android tests and
failed.
Rather than jabs and parrying, let's turn this conversation into a
constructive one. If you receive a
communication about Mesa on Android, how do you want the Mesa version
communicated to you so that you can fetch and then inspect that same Mesa?
Keep in mind that the Android Mesa tree is regularly rebased onto master, so
the shas
are not as useful as you would hope. Also know that we have git tags for
the "useless" dates if you know where to fetch from.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
