On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:28 AM, gregory hainaut <gregory.hain...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:52:46 -0700 > Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote: >> gregory hainaut <gregory.hain...@gmail.com> writes: >> > On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:38:19 -0700 >> > Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote: >> > >> >> Please, patches for Mesa have to actually be addressed to Mesa. >> > >> > What do you mean? The github tree (was requested by Jordan)?
Sorry for confusing the situation. You should send patches to mesa-dev. This makes it possible to reply for code reviews. But, if you want to be nice for potential testers/committers we've started recommending people post a git tree as well. (Particularly for a long patch series.) -Jordan >> > Or >> > because the mail header doesn't contains mesa address (mail client >> > setup issue that it is now fixed) ? >> >> The mail header. >> > > Any feedback on the others patches ? Would you prefer a resending of the patch > with the proper mail header ? > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
