Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> writes: > I'd prefer to see sbc stay with its current name, since that's its name > in the specs we're trying to implement (GLX_OML_sync_control, > GLX_INTEL_swap_event). If you drop the rename from the patch, > > Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net>
Sounds good. > I read that as "SBC is incremented when the PresentComplete comes in" > not "SBC is incremented when we generate the Present request". > Otherwise glXWaitForSbcOML doesn't make much sense. (in the "e.g." I'm > assuming they're talking a hardware register for pageflipping that > immediately starts scanning out the new stuff, not our fancy new > automatically double buffered ones that you have to push hard on to get > an immediate pageflip mode) Oh, that's almost sensible. And nicely eliminates the silly sleep(1) loop. New patches coming shortly. -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgppjA6dKRi9F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
