https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71944
--- Comment #7 from Martin Andersson <g02ma...@gmail.com> --- Thanks for the explanation. I made a hack that prevented the "y: MUL T0.y, KC0[3].x, R1.x" instruction from being added to group 13. Then those two groups became this: 0102 000000fd 00200c90 12 x: MOV R1.x, [0x40800000 4].x 0104 00002083 2f800090 y: MUL T0.y, KC0[3].x, R1.x 0106 000004fd 40400c90 z: MOV R2.z, [0x40400000 3].y 0108 80002883 6fa00090 w: MUL T1.w, KC0[3].z, R1.x 0110 40800000 0111 40400000 0112 000000f9 00000c90 13 x: MOV R0.x, 1.0 0114 000000fd 20400c90 y: MOV R2.y, [0x40000000 2].x 0116 00002c83 4f800090 z: MUL T0.z, KC0[3].w, R1.x 0118 81104a02 6f800610 w: SETE_DX10 T0.w, R[2+AR].z, KC0[2].z The test passes with this hack, but shouldn't instruction 116 also be in conflict with instruction 102? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
