On 17/02/14 06:49, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > > On Feb 16, 2014, at 17:15, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 16/02/14 02:00, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: >>> Mesa master hasn't built for OSX for over a year now, unfortunately, but I >>> agree excluding in Makefile.am is preferable to cpp-guards. Hopefully >>> "someone" will have the time and patience to get it working again in the >>> near future. >>> >> Hi Jeremy >> >> A while back, I was pondering on converting the apple glx to automake, >> but the biggest obstacle was the complete lack of testing (compile or >> runtime). iirc you have a tinderbox at x.org but it does not build mesa. >> Do you mind updating it ? > > It does build mesa (and has for quite some time now), but it builds it for > DRI (not Apple-DRI). If you want me to add another target (mesa-apple or > similar), let me know what configure options you want me to pass it to > trigger your new way. > Hmm perhaps I'm looking at the wrong location. This [1] is what I had in mind, but afaics it never even goes through the configure stage, let alone build it. Am I missing something ?
Whereas for build options - those depend on your requirements. I would start with what should should work atm, and then work on the "merge codebases" part. > FWIW, the end goal was to eventually merge the codebases together so we could > support both indirect GLX and Apple-DRI in the same libGL, but that never > happened. > Interesting, is this Apple-DRI backed by actual hw (classic/gallium) drivers or are we talking about swrast only ? AFAICS all hw dri drivers are quite linux specific. -Emil [1] http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/machines/jeremyhu-yuffie/ >> I might get back to that over the next few weeks, so keep an eye open. > > Awesome. Thanks. > > --Jeremy > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
