On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Building to provide accelration using swrast does not make > sense. > > Note: update your build script to explicitly mention svga > in the gallium drivers list, if you are building the vmwgfx > xa library. > > Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> > --- > configure.ac | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index 6db3c1d..d98dca9 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -1234,6 +1234,9 @@ dnl > dnl XA configuration > dnl > if test "x$enable_xa" = xyes; then > + if test "x$gallium_drivers" = xswrast; then > + AC_MSG_ERROR([Building xa requires at least one non swrast gallium > driver]) > + fi > GALLIUM_STATE_TRACKERS_DIRS="xa $GALLIUM_STATE_TRACKERS_DIRS" > enable_gallium_loader=yes > enable_gallium_drm_loader=yes > -- > 1.9.0
It's a never ending battle if we try to catch all kinds of nonsensical build configurations. I don't think it's worth it, except in a few cases. In fact, doesn't xf86-video-vmware just link against libxatracker? I don't think preventing xatracker from building without a vmwgfx target is even correct. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
