Chris Forbes <chr...@ijw.co.nz> writes:
> As of 943b2d52bf5, layout(binding) on an atomic would fail the assertion
> here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes <chr...@ijw.co.nz>
> Cc: Ian Romanick <ian.d.roman...@intel.com>

Tested-by: Carl Worth <cwo...@cworth.org>

(That is, on my Intel laptop this patch fixes all the regressions I saw
on 10.1 and otherwise passes all piglit tests just fine.)

Ian, if you're good with this patch, then we can land it in master and
10.1 and finally cut the 10.1.1 release.

-Carl

-- 
carl.d.wo...@intel.com

Attachment: pgp8HT3_ZLQ3h.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to