Bruno Jiménez <brunoji...@gmail.com> writes: > From: Tom Stellard <thomas.stell...@amd.com> > > --- > src/gallium/include/pipe/p_defines.h | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_defines.h > b/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_defines.h > index a3a1ae1..93f9642 100644 > --- a/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_defines.h > +++ b/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_defines.h > @@ -641,7 +641,8 @@ enum pipe_compute_cap > PIPE_COMPUTE_CAP_MAX_LOCAL_SIZE, > PIPE_COMPUTE_CAP_MAX_PRIVATE_SIZE, > PIPE_COMPUTE_CAP_MAX_INPUT_SIZE, > - PIPE_COMPUTE_CAP_MAX_MEM_ALLOC_SIZE > + PIPE_COMPUTE_CAP_MAX_MEM_ALLOC_SIZE, > + PIPE_COMPUTE_CAP_MAX_CLOCK_FREQUENCY,
You should also update the docs (src/gallium/docs/source/screen.rst) with a short description of the new compute cap -- specifically, in which unit is the clock frequency expressed. Wouldn't it make more sense to express it in MHz as it was in the original patch series so it matches what OpenCL expects? > }; > > /** > -- > 1.9.2 > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
pgpjf0PJa2kSr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
