On Friday, June 13, 2014 03:27:13 PM Carl Worth wrote: > This continues my ongoing series to make the preprocessor conform more > precisely to the specifications. > > I am sprinkling these patches out as I write and test them because they are > each logically independent. If people would prefer that I batch them up and > submit them as a single series, I can do that instead. > > I am adding "make check" tests for each of the issues I fix with each patch. I > haven't been running piglit, but I will do a piglit run over the whole series > before I push anything to ensure I haven't caused any regressions. > > With the two patches emailed here, there's only one logical change. I did > write it in two pieces though, so I'm submitting it that way. If anyone would > prefer these to be squashed, I could easily do that. > > -Carl
Both of these two are: Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> This isn't as bad as I thought. Also, I love the test cases :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
